Part 1: Democratic conditions -- Chapter one, Crisis and Opportunity -- Chapter two, Democracy Under Strain -- Chapter three, Enemies of Democracy: Populism and Scapegoating -- Chapter four, Essentials of Democracy: Liberalism and Pluralism.-Part 2: Journalism's Ethical Fundamentals -- Chapter five, Tolerance: History and Practice -- Chapter six, Journalistic Truth: Empirical and Contingent - Chapter seven, Free speech: Rights and Limitations -- Chapter eight, Impartiality: Attainable and Assessable.-Part 3: Press Development and Theory.-Chapter nine, Development of Professional Mass Media -- Chapter Ten,Development of Social Media -- Chapter eleven, Theories of the Press -- Chapter Twelve, A New Press Theory: Democratic Revival.-Part 4:Journalism and the Future of Democracy -- Chapter Thirteen, Conclusion.
Zugriffsoptionen:
Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Intro -- About the Author -- Dedication -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- CONTENTS -- PREFACE -- INTRODUCTION -- 1 LESSONS FROM WIKILEAKS -- 2 THE CONCEPT OF ACCOUNTABILITY -- 3 VALUES, PRINCIPLES, AND ETHICAL THEORIES -- 4 FOUR KEY CONCEPTS -- 5 IMPARTIALITY -- 6 CONFLICT OF INTEREST -- 7 'THE GRINDER' -- 8 CONSENT -- 9 TRUTH-TELLING -- 10 SOURCES AND CONFIDENCES -- 11 DECEPTION AND BETRAYAL -- 12 PRIVACY -- 13 TRAUMA, DISASTERS, AND SUICIDE -- 14 ONLINE ETHICAL PROBLEMS -- 15 TAKING CARE OF OURSELVES -- 16 A CODE OF ETHICS FOR THE DIGITAL AGE -- MEDIA CODES OF ETHICS AND PRACTICE -- BIBLIOGRAPHY -- NOTES.
Zugriffsoptionen:
Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
L'a. répond aux questions d'un intellectuel musulman au sujet des liens entre la politique française d'immigration et l'éthique. Il émet une réserve méthodologique envers les amalgames avec la période du nazisme
Dans cette introduction aux actes du colloque Bonhoeffer de l'ATEM (2006 au Louverain), l'a. rappelle la complexité de l'interprétation de l'éthique de Bonhoeffer, notamment si l'on considère les différentes étapes de sa pensée (Nachfolge, Ethique, Résistance et soumission). Il en appelle à une réception généalogique et critique
"This book discusses undercover reporting and deception in journalism, addressing the ethical issues encountered by professionals when deception is involved and providing an explanation of how high-profile cases have developed. Carson and Muller begin by examining how philosophical theories which form the basis of contemporary ethical codes for journalists, bear upon undercover reporting and questions of deception in the digital age. Drawing upon case studies such as Al Jazeera's undercover operation against the National Rifle Association in the US and the One Nation political party in Australia, and Britain's Channel 4 infiltration of Cambridge Analytica, this book goes on to define and discuss the ethical concepts behind deception and betrayal and lays out an original ethical framework for undercover journalists facing related challenges in their work. Undercover Reporting, Deception and Betrayal in Journalism is an important research text for students and academics in journalism and media studies"--
The terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center in New York on 11 September 2001 saw the start of the so-called war on terror. The aim of 'In the Name of Security - Secrecy, Surveillance and Journalism' is to assess the impact of surveillance and other security measures on in-depth public interest journalism. How has the global fear-driven security paradigm sparked by 11 September affected journalism? At the core of the book sits what the authors have labeled the 'trust us dilemma'. Governments justify passing, at times, oppressive and far-reaching anti-terror laws to keep citizens safe from terror. By doing so governments are asking the public to trust their good intentions and the integrity of the security agencies. But how can the public decide to trust the government and its agencies if it does not have access to information on which to base its decision? 'In the Name of Security - Secrecy, Surveillance and Journalism' takes an internationally comparative approach using case studies from the powerful intelligence-sharing group known as the Five Eyes consisting of the US, Canada, the UK, Australia and New Zealand. Chapters assessing a selection of EU countries and some of the BRICS countries provide additional and important points of comparison to the English-speaking countries that make up the Five Eyes.
Legacy media outlets, especially newspapers, have confronted significant challenges this century due to the shift of advertising revenues to digital platforms like Facebook and Google. Major events like the Global Financial Crisis (2007–2009) and Covid-19 pandemic intensified the financial strain, resulting in further downsizing and newsroom closures. Despite these difficulties, digital-native journalism has experienced widespread growth globally. This article explores funding models of selected digital-native journalism in Australia, drawing on platform dependency theory to address questions of what role digital technology platforms and nascent regulation have played in shaping the state of digital-native journalism in Australia. Australia's concentrated media ownership landscape and its introduction of the world-first News Media Bargaining Code (NMBC), provide a unique backdrop to examine the economic and regulatory environment that impacts Australia's digital-native journalism. Using a case-study approach, the research explores seven diverse digital-native news outlets over six years across three time periods: several years after the Global Financial Crisis (2017), just prior to the Covid-19 pandemic (2020–), and after the introduction of the NMBC (2023). Expert interviews provide insights into the role of digital platforms in shaping digital-only media. The digital native fail rate in this study is high (>40%). But we also find that of those that endure, the most successful placed a premium on building a distinctive brand (often through specialized reporting), adopting a diversified (hybrid) funding model, and growing audience share through trust. Most benefited from regulation in the form of the NMBC to increase newsroom resources, yet were also cautious of platform dependency.